There has been increased hand-wringing across the AI community in recent months about the limitations of deep learning.
Go Beyond
We believe that renting is the future of getting dressed.
Jennifer Hyman
CEO
Learn More
We believe everyone has the right to a malware-free existence.
Marcin Kleczynski
CEO
Learn More
We engineer a different kind of shaving experience.
Jeff Raider & Andy
Katz-Mayfield, Co-CEOs
Learn More
We help companies build an agile workforce where and when they need it.
Rob Biederman &
Pat Petitti, Co-CEOs
Learn More
The law touches every corner of the business world. Virtually everything that companies do—sales, purchases, partnerships, mergers, reorganizations—they do via legally enforceable contracts. Innovation would grind to a halt without a well-developed body of intellectual property law. Day to day, whether we recognize it or not, each of us operates against the backdrop of our legal regime and the implicit possibility of litigation.
A schism lies at the heart of the field of artificial intelligence. Since its inception, the field has been defined by an intellectual tug-of-war between two opposing philosophies: connectionism and symbolism. These two camps have deeply divergent visions as to how to "solve" intelligence, with differing research agendas and sometimes bitter relations.